Home Boys' Lists Girls' Lists Men's Teams Women's Teams News Photos Contributors Links Help Sign-UpOnline Store
Latest News | Categories | Authors | News Archives

News & Features

View from the Chair
College Format Changes - The Vote of 21-19

The scoring system of tennis is one of its most sacred heirlooms. The fluctuation of pressures from one lead to the next is why tennis dwarfs other racquet sports in comparison. The tennis player must not only become adept in skill-sets of physical performance, but the scoring forces him/her to develop good abilities in mental and emotional aspects as well. The intrigue and drama of the game happen largely because of the implications of rapidly changing momentum swings enhanced by a scoring system established over 100 years ago.

Chuck Kriese, Head Coach of The Citadel
The ITA (Intercollegiate Tennis Association) had its annual convention and coaches meeting in December. The hottest and the most pressing topic of 2013-14 has become 'Collegiate Dual-match Formats and Scoring Systems.' The overused talking point being promoted this year is: "College tennis will not survive unless the dual match format starts and finishes under three hours." This same issue was also the hot topic in the spring of 2012 when a collegiate committee had randomly injected a radical system destined to drastically change college tennis' long-used traditional format. There had been obvious scheduling problems at the 2012 NCAA tournament as 32 teams (16 men and 16 women's) had to play late into the night making the event looked much less than professional.

The college committee reacted to long days of tennis at the NCAA event by trying to push forward a deviation from the normal format. The new dual match proposal in summer of 2012 was met with 10,000-plus signatures of protest from around the country. An internet site had been set up by tennis student-athletes in protest. Tennis coaches, players and college tennis supporters expressed serious disapproval. To slow down the fire-storm, the committee tabled their idea and waited. The movement continued this summer as a joint USTA/college group introduced a 'morphed' version of what they had tried to do a year earlier.

Prior to 2006, men and women's teams played at different sites. A 51-2 vote by men's coaches in 2005 wanted to keep it that way, but the board pushed forward an agenda to combine all men and women's teams to be the same site anyway. Scheduling before that move was always a challenge, but it was never a great issue as the unique needs of both groups were handled well.

Multiple collegiate coaches believe that the three-hour time limit for college match is a talking-point and a potential 'Ruse.' It is primarily based on entertainment objectives with little regard for player development issues. Brian Boland, coach of the National Championship Virginia Cavaliers stated at the ITA meeting, "The real problem is not the time, but more it is that there were too many moving parts at our NCAA championships with 32 teams to take care of. It has created a logistical nightmare." In agreement are traditional coaches who believe that the educational aspects of tennis are a more important part of the college game. Those coaches disdain the abbreviated and bastardized formats for scoring. To not use traditional scoring drastically deemphasizes important elements of work ethic, conditioning and important learning aspects that only come from tough matches.

The December meeting of the ITA brought the fight between 'Education vs. Entertainment' to the floor. After nearly five hours of debate and heated emotions of philosophical divisions, the board members eliminated all options but two from the black board and gave the men's coaches a choice and a vote. Both were designed to shorten the matches and no-other option would be acceptable for the first third of the season of 2014. There was never an agreement of the coaches in the room that 'time' was the true reason for the problems of college tennis. That early talking point and need to shorten the match seemed to have become as an assumption of truth.

The two formats were presented. The first format was that singles matches would be best of three sets with traditional scoring. However, a tie-breaker would be played at 5-5 instead of 6-6. The doubles would only be a 6 game set instead of a pro-set. The second proposed format was that the players would play full singles matches and a pro-set for doubles. However, the abbreviated system of no-ad would be used. The vote was made. Coaches voted to protect the integrity of traditional tennis scoring with a 21-19 vote in favor of using regular scoring with tiebreakers at 5-5 instead of 6-6. A vote had been made, and most left the room feeling that a small victory had been won in the preservation of a scoring system that would not diminish the game.

The board of directors met for a separate meeting later that day to finalize the matter. Interestingly, it was decided that the vote taken in the afternoon was too close to call, and there was definitely not a mandate for either system. In a turn of events, the decision made by the board was that it should therefore be allowable for another format to be promoted as the solution. It was as if an election between two political candidates was too close to call, and so an outside candidate was put into place. The board decided on a format for the first six weeks of the season where abbreviated sets with tiebreakers 5-all would be used in addition to no-ad scoring. Arguably, this new option actually took the worst aspect of the first two proposals and pushed them both into play. The mandate to be put into place had never been debated by the general coaching body - nor had it been brought up as an alternative in the coaches meeting.

The great game of tennis should be protected and not be compromised by political agenda. College tennis is one of the most important developmental tools that our country has for our youngsters to hone their skills and develop important leadership abilities. It is simplistic at best to conclude that the saving of a few minutes in a tennis match is worth all that is lost by the dismantling of its scoring system.


Leave a Comment


More Special Features

Laaksonen the Winner at 20th Champaign Challenger
Singles winner Henri Laaksonen and doubles champions David O'Hare and Joe Salisbury had plenty to celebrate on Saturday as they took the top prizes at the USTA JSM Champaign pro circuit event, but they weren't the only ones cheering. The Challenger celebrated its 20th year, making it one of the longest running tournaments of its kind in the country.

ImRecruitable College Training Day and Showcase
ImRecruitable will once again host its largest recruiting event of the year. The College Training Day and Showcase will be held at Sunrise Tennis Club in Sunrise, Fla., on Dec 2 and 3, 2015. These events allow players the opportunity to gain maximum exposure and networking with college coaches that can lead directly to scholarship opportunities.

USTA Adds Brad Stine to National Collegiate Coaching Staff
Brad Stine has coached tennis for 30 years, and he was recently appointed as the newest member of the USTA Player Development's collegiate division. Colette Lewis of ZooTennis.com recently talked with Stine about many topics - including the reasons he decided to pursue coaching, the five requirements for success as a pro, the value of the college pathway and the ITF's push for more prize money at the lower levels.

 Special Feature Index |   Subscribe

Prince Textreme Tour 100L Racquet
A full size video with all related links is available on our store's YouTube Channel. To purchase from Tennis Express or to find out more, Click Here!
11/25 Jackson Cobb chooses Texas Tech
11/25 Hannah Dattilo chooses Oglethorpe
11/25 Rebecca Herrington chooses Lake Superior St.
11/24 Matthew Gonzales chooses Ottawa
11/24 William Piekarsky chooses Indiana
11/24 Adam Ambrozy chooses Columbia
11/24 Roos Van Der Zwaan chooses Auburn
11/24 Samantha Smith chooses BYU
11/24 Osgar O'Hoisin chooses Wisconsin
11/24 Gui Gomes chooses Illinois

Full Listings: Boys' Commits & Girls' Commits

  Tommy Robredo
ASICS Men's Gel Resolution 5 Tennis Shoes
Was: $140.00  Now: $89.00
  Leonardo Mayer
LOTTO Men's Stratosphere Clay Tennis Shoes
Was: $154.00  Now: $109.99
  Ernests Gulbis
adidas Men's Barricade 2015 Clay Tennis Shoes
Was: $140.00  Now: $99.95
  Milos Raonic
NEW BALANCE Men's 996v2 D Width Tennis Shoes
Was: $119.95  Now: $84.95
Inspiration Academy Tennis Program
Inspiration Academy Tennis Program with Ashley Hobson.
11/25 Eight US Girls, Two US Boys Reach Third Round at Grade 1 Yucatan Cup; More College Commitments, News; Paul Featured in Entouraj for Kids Charity Event
11/24 Bellis Defeats Seed in Carlsbad $125K; College Players Dominate Waco Futures; USTA's October Honor Roll; ITA Division II, III and NAIA Fall Rankings
11/23 My Conversation with Austin Krajicek; College Commitments Galore
11/22 Anisimova Defeats Swan in Girls Singles Final in Grade A Abierto Juvenil Mexicano, Olivieri Wins Boys Title; Wiersholm Claims Pensacola Futures Championship
11/21 Anisimova Reaches Grade A Final in Mexico; Fritz Falls, Giving Australian Open Wild Card to Rubin; Rybakov and Wiersholm Advance to Pensacola Futures Final

Page updated on Wednesday, August 12, 2015
Contact our web team with any corrections